>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:32:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Lars> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | > Lars> | > | > Uh, no. But returning by value should do no harm. Lars> | > | Lars> | > | I agree that it would simplify things. Would you return a Lars> string or a | > | char const* ? Lars> | > Lars> | > A string. Lars> | > Lars> | > A const string even... Lars> | Lars> | I knew it. Lars> One reason: inset1-> name() == inset2->name() Lars> Would that work with char const *? It would work if the name is always the same char array, defined once in the inset .C file. And the addresses can be used as inset codes too. JMarc
