Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> The fact that I use rows for fixing the reference is is not crucial (in
> fact, it is somewhat broken: if a previous row gets eliminated because of
> rebreaking, we will see a one-row jump on screen. Maybe the right solution
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this is if we record the row by a row number. If we keep the row by a
pointer it's better, but we are losed if this pointer becomes invalid.
Hints welcomed.Alfredo
