On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:04:47AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Friday 16 August 2002 2:19 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > | > > So we would lose lazy construction. > | > > | > What was this good for anyway? To reduce startup time? > | > | Conceptual elegance? Reducing compile times? Lars knows. > > Just back from a wonderfull weekend at the west coast of Norway; what > does Lars know?
People say Lars should know what lazy dialog construction is good for. My guess was better startup times, Angus thought of "conceptual elegance". Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
