On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:55:36AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >I don't see these as problems.
>
> In my opinion this breaks the idea of GUII.
Au contraire, this has been the intention of LyX's GUII work for a very
long time. We are *not* going to go down the XUL path ;)
> I'll report whenever I have time to dig into comparing the frontends.
Thanks.
> Indeed! But practically, there still will be a manual and reference guide
> etc. It would be horrible if Xforms and Qt need their own versions, because
> they are not compatible.
Yes, it's a problem. But it's not that big a problem.
> >Alas for you, but you're not writing the code and UI :)
>
> Argh, don't talk Microsoft language :(.
huh ???
> Well, do the xforms people agree? Is Qt indeed the UI default
> going-to-be and all other frontends should follow the Qt layout. Or is
> the underlying plan to abandon Xforms completely as soon as Qt is
> fully implemented?
No idea, I'm not that interested ;)
regards
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims."
- Aristotle
