On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:46:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I would not be too sure about that. We could "write everything
> Andre> to .tex" if a certain flag is set and honour this on read-back.
>
> Why do you need .tex?? Just output .lyx to the clipboard and parse it
> back? I just do not understand the need for an extra format.
Because .tex contains the \begin{proof}...\end{proof} whereas .lyx only has
\layout proof which is changed to \layout standard if read tith the wrong class
and not to a sequence ert-standard-ert.
Apart from that, .tex is not exactly an 'extra format', is it?
> Andre> I was actually thinking about using something similar to save
> Andre> the "locked" state of math insets (i.e. write a \lyxlock
> Andre> 'marker' to the .lyx, but not to .tex).
>
> What is the "locked" state?
One can 'lock' insets to make them into a unit concerning 'ordinary cursor
movement'. Unfortuantely, that state is not saved (but I intend to change
that).
> >> I think trying to go through .tex to solve such problems is
> >> misguided, anyway.
>
> Andre> Why? It's the only clean solution I can imagine. As we do not
> Andre> have to parse arbitrary .tex but only things generated by
> Andre> ourselves I'd even think this is feasible.
>
> Again: what do you want to do with your \begin{proof}...\end{proof}?
> Generate ERT that will not even compile?
I want the proof survive the cycle mylayout->otherlayout->mylayout.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
