On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:38:11PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Sure, but I would bet that mathed has some things easier on it compared > to the requirements of insettabular/insettext. No-one (except Juergen I > guess) really knows what they are though.
More FUD. I think there will be a time when I can't stand it anymore. The requirements are theoretical exactly the same. That mathed does not implement everything (like \multicolumn for arrays) is no technical problem but a result of my limited time. You can not reasonably expect me implementing within one year what has taken six years and three or four people on average for the rest of LyX. > And I find the code really difficult to understand, I don't think I > will ever understand InsetText::updateInsetInInset even on a basic level. No updateInsetInInset in mathed. Trivially to understand. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
