On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:39:57PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | + result = (*h.second)(bv, h.first, arg);
>
> boost::bind
> boost::function
> ??
Ooh, interesting. I've been reading and it looks like we can use member
functions like this :
actions.add(LFUN_SHIFT_TAB, &InsetTabular::action_shift_tab,
&Inset::status_default);
class Action {
void add(kb_action action, boost::function<action::result, Inset *, string
const & arg);
...
}
dispatch(kb_action action, string const & arg) {
Inset * inset = theLockingInset();
if (inset) {
map[action](inset, action);
} else {
default_map[action](action);
}
}
We would probably use a proxy friend of Inset so we don't need massive
headers in complicated classes or something.
I think this deals with Andre's objections (no context hereh, just the
virtual dispatch for action_shift_tab) and it means we can use member
variables in the action handler etc.
Does this sound workable ? How could I use bind instead ?
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
