John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The requires a pretty smart linker, I am not sure if all systems have
>> that. How can the preferred gui then be placed in lyxrc?
>
| why do we want to do that ? I don't understand the point, and I do
| understand how ugly this code is going to look.
I do not belive that it is going to be ugly at all.
>> | Besides, the LyX team have been messing about with GUIIsation of the
>> | dialogs for, what, 3 years ? More ?
>>
>> I am happily accepting patches...
>
| Well this is evidently not true.
Well... if the comitter cannot take critisim...
>> It is not I that is driving the GUII effort (and it never was).
>
| Who is it ? Do they have the time to liaise with me on getting work into
| the tree in a form agreeable to all ?
piecemeal please...
>> Have you seen any dl code introduced yet?
>
| Yes. Would you be using extern "C" otherwise ?
then remove the extern "C" if you do not like them...
>> What act?
>
| The act of producing a cool application that users love, whilst having a
| nice maintainable implementation ?
then help me flean up the core data structurs...
| I've said it before, I'll say it again: the fact that there are still
| LyX users despite the user interface it has speaks wonders for how
| useful LyX is
I am a bit uncertain why all this flamage is beeing directed at me...
(was it a good party tonight?)
--
Lgb
