On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:18:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty, > > > or even better, \bm from bm.sty > > > > Does this fit well into the new font stuff? > > Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to MathTextCodes? > > No, because the bold symbols are taken from several fonts. > For example: > cmbx for letters and digits > cmmib for greek letters and some symbols > cmbsy for over symbols
What a mess. But it is "logical" bold, isn't it? So one could hack it in by providing another 'char' argument for whichFont()... Not nice, though. Can't these symbols get collected in a single font? (I still don't know anything about fonts, so this question might be silly.) How does LaTeX handle it? ... Let's have a look... - uh. I don't understand the definition of \boldsymbol. Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
