>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 05-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> cur_cel is set everytime we get the pointer to the inset via
>> GetCellInset. It does not have to be the act_cell. Obviously, there
>> are some ways to get that inset that we forgot to check...
Juergen> What I meant was that the message there is stupid, it's
Juergen> obvious that if we do some undo in a cell that we haven't
Juergen> been there before. What I meant is that the code there is
Juergen> RIGHT the error is somewhere else, but we don't need that
Juergen> message it's just for creating alerts where there is nothing
Juergen> to see!
We should probably remove the message before 1.2.0, but I think it is
good to keep it around in order to check whether improvements are
possible. In particular, if you get _many_ of these, I would think
that they come from a loop over a tabular, not individual undos. In
this case, we should fix something somewhere.
What about a backtrace so that we can check by ourselves?
JMarc
