On 05-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Sure. But I'd rather call it
>
> struct MathInitializer()
> {
> MathInitializer() {
> big_lyxfunc_switch->register(LFUN_MATH_INSERT, my_math_insert);
> big_lyxfunc_switch->register(LFUN_MATH_DISPLAY, my_math_display);
> ...
> }
> };
>
> static MathInitializer dummy;
Sure and as soon as we can register lyx-funcs to the Dispatcher (or
LyXAction then we all will do as you, but in the time being we should
wait until Lars has the time to do it and concentrate on fixing stuff
instead of inserting lot's and lot's of new stuff or shuffle stuff around
which is really not need to do. I for my part did stop inserting new features
since I'm REALLY ocupied to make InsetText & Co. work so that we can get
to a 1.2.0 release really soon. And don't think I wouldn't like to get
some mail of my LyX-ToDo folder and realize some long-standing features I
really would like tabular code to support! And there would be a whole row
of new insets which base on InsetText to be created for better use of say
"boxes" inside LyX, but IMO we should hold on and wait until we really can
say we're ready to release 1.2.0, for ours and ours users good!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up.
