On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:34:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Please look into rewriting the code that has problems to use > stringstream, that will actually be better in the long run than to > fiddle with the _() "macros". > > Just list the code-lines and I'll do the change... yes, ok. if this is a compiler bug, it's a fair enough workaround. though if not, I would prefer to have a special C_() macro for using c-style strings ... the core lyx code will always use string _(string) after all. thanks john -- "Research is not a warm puppy. At least, I hope not." - David Rydeheard
- Problem with gettext _() (bug 429678) John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (bug 429678) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (bug 429678) Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (bug 429678) John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (bug 429678... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (bug 42... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (b... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettext _(... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettext _() (b... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettext _(... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettex... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettex... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettex... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettex... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettex... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Problem with gettex... John Levon
- Re: Problem with gettex... Andre Poenitz
- Re: Problem with gettex... Lars Gullik Bjønnes