Re: Attempting (and failing) to compile natbib branch

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| you /clearly/ ignored my mail indicating the broken behaviour in the
| particular part of tabular.C then.

No, I saw that. But I didn't see a testcase that exibited this error.
But sure something was wrong with gcc.

| Never mind, a stupid flamewar
| about unofficial releases will get no-one nowhere. I've made my point,
| it certainly won't be me dealing with the problems we could well get
| from it.

[larsbj@trylle build]$ g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)

Is this the only 2.96 version that compiles lyx correctly?

-- 
        Lgb