Re: Attempting (and failing) to compile natbib branch

[John Levon]

On 30 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:

> | 
> |     Are you serious?  GCC-2.96 is unofficial crap!
> 
> And I still do not agree... Gcc 2.96 are working close to flawlessly
> for me. And a lot better than 2.95.2...

err, bull. Or perhaps you don't remember a few weeks back when lyx
was crashing for you on table inserts etc. ? That was a problem with
2.96, present in neither 2.95 or 3.0-snapshot (or 2.96-82 but that's irrelevant).

> But of course I run Gcc 2.96 will all RH patches applied.

you mean -69 ? It is buggy. Check out the resolution rawhide bugs in 
bugzilla.redhat.com !

john

-- 
"I personally think Windows NT will be the mainstream operating system within a few 
years."
"My belief: Linux will never go mainstream."
"I've always said that Linux could become a serious challenger to Microsoft's Windows 
NT."
        - Jesse Burst