John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 30 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > |
| > | Are you serious? GCC-2.96 is unofficial crap!
| >
| > And I still do not agree... Gcc 2.96 are working close to flawlessly
| > for me. And a lot better than 2.95.2...
|
| err, bull.
Hmm... are you sitting in my chair?
| Or perhaps you don't remember a few weeks back when lyx
| was crashing for you on table inserts etc. ? That was a problem with
| 2.96, present in neither 2.95 or 3.0-snapshot (or 2.96-82 but that's irrelevant).
I remember... the excat reason was never really discovered. Since we
failed to come up with a small test case (LyX failes is not one...),
we can't really know what was wrong. My guess is till that we do
something wrong in LyX that triggers a bug in Gcc 2.96.
| > But of course I run Gcc 2.96 will all RH patches applied.
|
| you mean -69 ? It is buggy. Check out the resolution rawhide bugs in
| bugzilla.redhat.com !
no.
--
Lgb
