>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Let's assume that C-a is not bound to anything. Then the first Lars> lookup will return -1 (no func), the we lookup again without C- Lars> and get self-insert as the fun. _If_ C-a had been bound then we Lars> would've run that fun instead. You mean that if I type C-a because I am used to emacs bindings, but my bindings are CUA, I will insert an "a" instead? That's a terrible thing to do!! If I encountered such a thing, I think I'd file it as a bug right away. This is agains the 'least surprise' principle of any UI. JMarc PS: think about what happen if the non shifted version of the lfun is destructive.
- asciitilde binding bug Reuben Thomas
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: asciitilde binding ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jules Bean
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jules Bean
- Re: asciitilde binding bug Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Why docs don't get updated ... mike.ressler
- Re: Why docs don't get ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Why docs don't get ... mike.ressler