On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:46:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I did not read completely your comment in docstring.h. I think we can get > rid completely of the names trvstring and trivdocstring soon after this > landed.
If we are sure that the thread safety issue is gone for all reasonable STL implemtations then yes (so far I saw only explicit ack for gcc5, but did not googled around). I saw trivstring declarations across the code as useful marker of thread sensitivity if we discover that the above is not true and need to fix it again. > In this view, I do not think that we need a test to check that the > c++ implementation of string works, do we? I meant is as a check for our docstring wrapper. But I don't have any skin in this game and am completely fine with removing it. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
