On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
I am all for ditching trivstring, but it all depends on Enrico's
stance, I didn't
folow the previous discussion on strings and COW, so I have little idea
what is the right course of action.
Cygwin does not need trivstring. It was using the implementation in
src/support/trivstring.cpp simply because we wrongly decide that
std::string implementation uses cow when _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI is set.
I think that if we ditch trivstring we don't need to set
STD_STRING_USES_COW. In this case, the patch I proposed to check whether
cow is actually used or not will also not be necessary.
--
Enrico
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
