On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:28:08AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 03/10/2024 ?? 23:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > > But I don't like it there as all trivstring stuff should imho go into > > trivstring.h. > > Before I was afraid what will break, but as I broke cygwin anyway, maybe > > it's time > > to get rid of this from docstring? > > If we decide that we want at least gcc5,
It was released 2015. We won't release 2.5 sooner than 2026 so I think we are out of distros 10y LTS range and can safely declare gcc5 dependency. > we can get rid of trivstring > altogether. As far as I remember, cygwin uses modern strings but pretends > that it does not. I am not sure that I saw a justification for it. I am all for ditching trivstring, but it all depends on Enrico's stance, I didn't folow the previous discussion on strings and COW, so I have little idea what is the right course of action. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
