On 12/26/22 20:01, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
Riki, let me know :)!
In another email, I said:
I am planning to do the tarball tomorrow, so I guess the question is
whether these changes can be *completed* by then. Since they don't
affect really core code, I'm not too worried about them being mature yet.
So if you think this is really done, go ahead. If you're not sure, then
let's wait.
I'm attaching a new version of the patch with the updated
layout2layout script (including a change for layout version 98 that
was skipped, if I understand correctly). There is also a second patch
that updates the layouts.
That's a bit confusing. You just need to handle up to format 98. It's
the OLD format number that's being tested in those conditions. So you
want if 87 <= format <= 98.
That said, are we sure there's nothing to do here? Suppose someone has a
custom layout for some remark-like construction. Do we just want to
leave that as is?
Riki
--
----------------------------
Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
Pronouns: they/them/their
Website:http://rkheck.frege.org/
Blog:http://rikiheck.blogspot.com/
Amazon:http://amazon.com/author/richardgheckjr
Google Scholar:https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QUKBG6EAAAAJ
ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-2663
Research Gate:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Heck
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
