Le 26/04/2022 à 14:58, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
I read somewhere that 64 bit for long long was a 'should' and not a 'must'.
There is subtlety here, which might be the source of confusion. The standard
does not tell you
long long needs to be *implemented* by 64bits. It just tells you to contain the
range of 2^64.
So standard does not prohibit you to write compiler which uses 65 bits for long
long.
And if I understand correctly, C++11 tells you that 'long long' has to
exist, which was not the case before if I am not mistaken.
I agree with Pavel that using 'long long' works, although I am not sure
that the removal of one header will save the world.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
