Am Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:05:37 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>:
> Le 19/04/2022 à 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> Besides the discussion of FINDSHORT, I do not think that size_t is a > >> good type, since the only guarantee is that it is more than 16 bits > >> (even on 32bit architectures, it is probably 32 bits). int64_t is > >> probably what you are after. > > > > Yes. I had the (apparently wrong) impression that size_t == . > > This is exact, regexp-wise: size_t is... something :) > > >> Using int64_t instead of Debug::Type is indeed the thing to do for > >> bitfields like this. However, it would be best to define this type as > >> Debug::base_type or some simpler name if you have one in mind. > > > > Like > > typedef uint64_t Debug::base_type; > > ? > > Right. > > JMarc Done at d09f5ce1. Needs recompiling everything because 'make' here has not all dependencies right. I had to do: $ make clean $ make package in the build directory to get it right. Kornel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
pgpNJWM1NZBXn.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel