Le 19/04/2022 à 11:07, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Besides the discussion of FINDSHORT, I do not think that size_t is a
good type, since the only guarantee is that it is more than 16 bits
(even on 32bit architectures, it is probably 32 bits). int64_t is
probably what you are after.
Yes. I had the (apparently wrong) impression that size_t == .
This is exact, regexp-wise: size_t is... something :)
Using int64_t instead of Debug::Type is indeed the thing to do for
bitfields like this. However, it would be best to define this type as
Debug::base_type or some simpler name if you have one in mind.
Like
typedef uint64_t Debug::base_type;
?
Right.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
