Am Di., 13. Aug. 2019 um 16:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:43:25PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Seems we already account for the problem with some \expandafter trickery,
> > see InsetTabular:2473ff. and 2603ff.
> >
> > Alas, the trick breaks as soon as the positioning argument of \cmidrule
> is
> > used. If somebody feels brave enough to tinker with expansion, please
> tell
> > me which \expandafter's are missing here:
> >
> >
> \expandafter\cmidrule\expandafter{\expandafter1\string-1}\expandafter\cmidrule(lr)\expandafter{\expandafter2\string-2}\expandafter\cmidrule\expandafter{\expandafter3\string-3}
>
> If no one chimes in in couple days I can ask on cz list.
>
Note that the following compiles, but the lines are vertically shifted:
\expandafter\cmidrule\expandafter{\expandafter1\string-1}\expandafter\cmidrule\expandafter(\expandafter
l\expandafter
r\expandafter)\expandafter{\expandafter2\string-2}\expandafter\cmidrule\expandafter{\expandafter3\string-3}
Apart from that, it is very ugly.
Jürgen
> Pavel
>
