On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:41:52PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/15/2017 03:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 05:27:26PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: > > > >> I propose to revert that commit in all branches pending a better > >> solution. I don't think that will be > >> too difficult to find. It's just a matter of doing the work. > > Reverting in 2.2.x makes sense to me to be extra safe. As for 2.3.x, I > > don't have a strong preference. It's up to you to decide the tradeoff > > between the cost of a small delay and the cost of #9185 (both costs seem > > small to me). From what I understand, the delay in undo only comes when > > a BibTeX inset is involved, which I imagine is not very often. > > No, it comes whenever a document contains a BibTeX inset. A better patch > would make it happen > only when a BibTeX inset was involved. Then the delay is no surprise: Of > course we have to reread > the files.
Ah I see. I agree then that reverting in the other branches as well is a good idea. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
