On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 05:27:26PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: > I propose to revert that commit in all branches pending a better > solution. I don't think that will be > too difficult to find. It's just a matter of doing the work.
Reverting in 2.2.x makes sense to me to be extra safe. As for 2.3.x, I don't have a strong preference. It's up to you to decide the tradeoff between the cost of a small delay and the cost of #9185 (both costs seem small to me). From what I understand, the delay in undo only comes when a BibTeX inset is involved, which I imagine is not very often. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature