On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 05:27:26PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote:

> I propose to revert that commit in all branches pending a better
> solution. I don't think that will be
> too difficult to find. It's just a matter of doing the work.

Reverting in 2.2.x makes sense to me to be extra safe. As for 2.3.x, I
don't have a strong preference. It's up to you to decide the tradeoff
between the cost of a small delay and the cost of #9185 (both costs seem
small to me). From what I understand, the delay in undo only comes when
a BibTeX inset is involved, which I imagine is not very often.

Thanks,

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to