On 10/15/2017 03:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 05:27:26PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: > >> I propose to revert that commit in all branches pending a better >> solution. I don't think that will be >> too difficult to find. It's just a matter of doing the work. > Reverting in 2.2.x makes sense to me to be extra safe. As for 2.3.x, I > don't have a strong preference. It's up to you to decide the tradeoff > between the cost of a small delay and the cost of #9185 (both costs seem > small to me). From what I understand, the delay in undo only comes when > a BibTeX inset is involved, which I imagine is not very often.
No, it comes whenever a document contains a BibTeX inset. A better patch would make it happen only when a BibTeX inset was involved. Then the delay is no surprise: Of course we have to reread the files. Richard
