On 2017-02-27, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Montag, 27. Februar 2017 um 21:44:35, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> >> On 2017-02-27, Kornel Benko wrote: ... >> >> >> Test #2102: >> >> >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF >> >> >> Test #2109: >> >> >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF >> ... >> >> >> pass >> > They are _not_ suspended, since you removed them from invertedTests. As >> > such, they do not pass here. (To see this, you have to rebuild cache) % >> > tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 2 >> Ah yes: to see whether I need to re-run cmake, > For export test it is easy: Every time you change a *Tests-file. CMake > creates test > according to the contents, 'ctest' runs the created tests. Yes, but when doing this a number of times and then pausing for supper or other real-life tasks, it happens that I don't remember whether the last step was a change or a reconfiguration... >> I checked whether the >> relevant tests were inverted or not and failed to spot this strange thing >> that not all inverted tests have "inverted" in their name! > That was my decision because the test name lengths started to be too long > and 'INVERTED' seamed to be a waste here. With the sublabels for inverted now in place, it would be better to drop SUSPENDED from the name. >> (Please, let us get rid of the complication with "suspended", >> otherwise I'll give up on testing.) >:( next round of arguing and not understanding completely each other ... I just added a real life example to show where this overcomplication hurts. Günter
