On 2017-02-27, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 27. Februar 2017 um 13:23:08, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> >> On 2017-02-27, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:37:45PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote:
>> >> +export/doc/(de|es)/EmbeddedObjects_pdf4_texF >> > ... >> >> -export/doc/de/EmbeddedObjects_pdf4_texF >> >> -export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_.*texF >> > Did you mean for your addition to be equivalent to these two individual >> > patterns? >> not really, the failure reason for EmbeddedObjects with XeTeX and tex fonts >> is due to inputenc = ASCII (as stated in the comment). >> Possible failure with LuaTeX, tex fonts and Spanish is due to >> Spanish-Babel assuming inputenc=utf8 for XeTeX and LuaTeX which leads to >> wrong output and some errors. >> Here, all 12 tests matching >> > ctest -N -R Embedded.*texF ... >> pass >> Feel free to add clauses for failing tests -- preferably sorted and under a >> telling comment after looking into the failure cause. > I think, Scott's question is because of > export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF and > export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF I understand. However, as >> Test #2102: >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF >> Test #2109: >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF belong to the 12 passing tests, I see no reason to invert them. So, to repeat my answer to Scott: No, this is not equivalent: * there is a difference * the difference is intended. * It may be that you get different results. If these two tests fail at your site, feel free to invert (with proper comment, under the proper subtag -- depending on the failure reason or under TODO, if there is no time to explore now).
