Am Montag, 27. Februar 2017 um 16:09:09, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2017-02-27, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 27. Februar 2017 um 13:23:08, schrieb Guenter Milde > > <mi...@users.sf.net> > >> On 2017-02-27, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:37:45PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote: > > > >> >> +export/doc/(de|es)/EmbeddedObjects_pdf4_texF > > >> > ... > > >> >> -export/doc/de/EmbeddedObjects_pdf4_texF > >> >> -export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_.*texF > > >> > Did you mean for your addition to be equivalent to these two individual > >> > patterns? > > >> not really, the failure reason for EmbeddedObjects with XeTeX and tex fonts > >> is due to inputenc = ASCII (as stated in the comment). > > >> Possible failure with LuaTeX, tex fonts and Spanish is due to > >> Spanish-Babel assuming inputenc=utf8 for XeTeX and LuaTeX which leads to > >> wrong output and some errors. > > >> Here, all 12 tests matching > > >> > ctest -N -R Embedded.*texF > ... > >> pass > > >> Feel free to add clauses for failing tests -- preferably sorted and under a > >> telling comment after looking into the failure cause. > > > I think, Scott's question is because of > > export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF and > > export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF > > I understand. However, as > > >> Test #2102: > >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF > >> Test #2109: > >> SUSPENDED.UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF
They are _not_ suspended, since you removed them from invertedTests. As such,
they do not pass here.
(To see this, you have to rebuild cache)
% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 2
Label Time Summary:
unreliable:wrong_output = 50.39 sec (2 tests)
Total Test time (real) = 52.28 sec
The following tests FAILED:
2099 - UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_dvi3_texF
(Failed)
2106 - UNRELIABLE.WRONG_OUTPUT_export/doc/es/EmbeddedObjects_pdf5_texF
(Failed)
Errors while running CTest
> belong to the 12 passing tests, I see no reason to invert them.
>
> So, to repeat my answer to Scott:
>
> No, this is not equivalent:
>
> * there is a difference
> * the difference is intended.
> * It may be that you get different results. If these two tests fail at your
> site, feel free to invert (with proper comment, under the proper subtag --
> depending on the failure reason or under TODO, if there is no time to
> explore now).
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
