On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:51:36PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016 um 10:56:29, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:28:48AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic > > > tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to > > > read. > > > > I agree this is the right policy. If I convert those comments to a LyX > > note or comment inset, this policy is still satisfied because the inset > > is just as readable, right? So either: > > > > (1) revert the commit I pushed and invert the test > > Please no. If we never interpret ERT, then this will stay inverted forever. > Inverted tests are waiting for correction, at least this was what I have/had > in mind. I tend to agree. Something feels wrong with inverting. Unless we label the issue as a LyX enhancement (and create a trac ticket) because there is no way in LyX to produce LyX-readable content in this case that can be exported to several different formats. > > or > > > > (2) change the inset for all beamer manuals. > > +1 OK I will go for this. I'll wait another day or so to see if Günter disagrees. Scott > > Do you agree that both would be satisfactory? > > > > Scott > > Kornel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
