On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:28:48AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > But at the same time I don't think it makes sense to deviate from the
> > original (English) version, where ERT is used.
>
> Yes.
>
> > So I think you are right that is the way to go, unless we want to
> > change all versions of the Beamer manual to a comment or note inset,
> > and that seems like more work than should be done for this trivial
> > issue.
>
> Yes.
>
> -> invert the test (pdf4_texF)
>
> > Changed to \'{e} in stable at 9f3518bc and cherry-picked to master at
> > 1c7835c0.
>
> > Thanks for the discussion. I now have a better idea of how to deal with
> > this for similar issues when they come up.
>
> I don't think this is the right way.
>
> The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic
> tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to read.
I agree this is the right policy. If I convert those comments to a LyX
note or comment inset, this policy is still satisfied because the inset
is just as readable, right? So either:
(1) revert the commit I pushed and invert the test
or
(2) change the inset for all beamer manuals.
Do you agree that both would be satisfactory?
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
