Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016 um 10:56:29, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
<skost...@lyx.org>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:28:48AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > > But at the same time I don't think it makes sense to deviate from the
> > > original (English) version, where ERT is used.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > So I think you are right that is the way to go, unless we want to
> > > change all versions of the Beamer manual to a comment or note inset,
> > > and that seems like more work than should be done for this trivial
> > > issue.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > -> invert the test (pdf4_texF)
> >
> > > Changed to \'{e} in stable at 9f3518bc and cherry-picked to master at
> > > 1c7835c0.
> >
> > > Thanks for the discussion. I now have a better idea of how to deal with
> > > this for similar issues when they come up.
> >
> > I don't think this is the right way.
> >
> > The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic
> > tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to
> > read.
>
> I agree this is the right policy. If I convert those comments to a LyX
> note or comment inset, this policy is still satisfied because the inset
> is just as readable, right? So either:
>
> (1) revert the commit I pushed and invert the test
Please no. If we never interpret ERT, then this will stay inverted forever.
Inverted tests are waiting for correction, at least this was what I have/had in
mind.
> or
>
> (2) change the inset for all beamer manuals.
+1
> Do you agree that both would be satisfactory?
>
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
