Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 19-Feb-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >|
| >| IMO there's a lot more to do on the textinset's when we use it in various
| >| different insets.
| >
| > Specifics?
| > The problem with textinsets now is when having a textinset in a
| > textinset and you can have that problem in a tabular as well...
|
| No this cannot happen now in insettabular (and I already explained this),
| as there the inset has a fixed! or a unlimited length. The problems we have
| right now is when the inset is limited by the width of the WorkArea
| (Window)!
How is this really different from the with of a tabular cell?
(there is something that I don't get...)
| > Besides this I see so special problems with NEW_INSET, in particular
| > footnotes and marginal notes seem to work just fine. (there might be
| > some drawing problems there too, but those are then a general problem
| > with insettext.)
| >
|
| Well did you think about that you cannot include some stuff inside a foot-
| note inset without generating LaTeX errors (I limited this by the function
| InsertInsetAllowed() which is called and so the inset is asked if it is
| permitted to insert the inset there, but I guess the list is now not
| > complete!
afaik this is not a new problem...at least not in entirety and is more
a QOI problem than a real problem with footnote insets etc.
| You know that one of the pro's to include the new tabular code inside 1.1.6
| was also to test the text-insets in a limited environment. IMO the text
| insets are working quite good there now, but as I said we HAVE problems with
| other environments!
And to ever get those tested we need to have them in the main
branch...
Lgb
