On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:06:04PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:03:54AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 25.04.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>:
> > > 
> > > Am 25.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> > >> 
> > >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:52:48PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > >>> Am 24.04.2016 um 07:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:03:15AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > >>>>>> Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> I imagine Guillaume did not intend this as a full patch,
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> Indeed.
> > >>>>>> ...
> > >>>>>> The difference between the bad display and the good display in this 
> > >>>>>> example
> > >>>>>> svg is the formula in the bottom right, which I can see on your 
> > >>>>>> screenshot.
> > >>>>>> To you see this formula before the patch?
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Ah yes I do see what you mean. I did not realize that. Because it was 
> > >>>>> so
> > >>>>> small I just assumed it was corrupted.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>>> It is strange that it displays so small, here it is at least twice 
> > >>>>>> as wide.
> > >>>>>> But here too I find it too small. I tested and the preview is 
> > >>>>>> smaller than
> > >>>>>> in 2.1.4, so there may be a regression.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Interesting. This could be a separate issue. I will do a bisect.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Bisect led me here: c053a939
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Stephan can you reproduce on OS X?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Yes. A little bit tricky because these commits doesn’t compile on my 
> > >>> system.
> > >>> 
> > >>>> To reproduce, download lyxinkscape.lyx and lyxinkscape.svg from #9778.
> > >>>> Do you see a difference in the size displayed in LyX before/after
> > >>>> c053a939.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> I wouldn't be surprised if this depends on the Qt version (e.g.
> > >>>> different Qt "features" and difficulty of Qt getting the high res 
> > >>>> right)
> > >>> 
> > >>> No, the problem is the assignment of params_.pixel_ratio to 4.0.
> > >>> It seems not needed anymore. I’ve made it to overcome the size problems
> > >>> with the internal SVG-converter on HiDPI displays.
> > >>> 
> > >>> The attached patch fixes it on my system.
> > >> 
> > >> Fixes it for me as well, and the patch seems simple. Do you recommend it
> > >> for 2.2.0?
> > > 
> > > Yes, I do. Thanks for bisecting.
> > > 
> > > LyX has a problem with rendering of external contents on HiDPI. But this
> > > has to be solved somehow later. The graphics are generated with low 
> > > resolution.
> > > I couldn’t find the solution and didn’t try hard enough to solve it.
> > > 
> > 
> > BTW, is it a problem how LyX handles the empty lines inside the float 
> > figure?
> > After open there is a empty line in front of the image inside the float. 
> > While
> > going forward with the cursor key this line gets removed and the document 
> > state is
> > „changed“. The TeX output is different too - the empty is removed from TeX 
> > too.
> > With this document there is no difference in PDF but I’m not sure if there 
> > are
> > documents possible where it matters…
> > 
> > Another empty line is after the caption label. 
> > The empty lines are empty „Plain Layout“ insets in the LyX source.
> 
> Good question, and I don't know if this is a problem or not. I do see
> what you mean.
> 
> Does anyone know if this is a problem?

The same behavior actually occurs on LyX 2.1.x (and e.g. LyX 2.1.3), so
I'm guessing this is not a problem.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to