On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:04:55PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:31:46AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 25.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:52:48PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > >> Am 24.04.2016 um 07:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> > >>> 
> > >>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:03:15AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > >>>>> Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> I imagine Guillaume did not intend this as a full patch,
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Indeed.
> > >>>>> ...
> > >>>>> The difference between the bad display and the good display in this 
> > >>>>> example
> > >>>>> svg is the formula in the bottom right, which I can see on your 
> > >>>>> screenshot.
> > >>>>> To you see this formula before the patch?
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Ah yes I do see what you mean. I did not realize that. Because it was 
> > >>>> so
> > >>>> small I just assumed it was corrupted.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>> It is strange that it displays so small, here it is at least twice as 
> > >>>>> wide.
> > >>>>> But here too I find it too small. I tested and the preview is smaller 
> > >>>>> than
> > >>>>> in 2.1.4, so there may be a regression.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Interesting. This could be a separate issue. I will do a bisect.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Bisect led me here: c053a939
> > >>> 
> > >>> Stephan can you reproduce on OS X?
> > >> 
> > >> Yes. A little bit tricky because these commits doesn’t compile on my 
> > >> system.
> > >> 
> > >>> To reproduce, download lyxinkscape.lyx and lyxinkscape.svg from #9778.
> > >>> Do you see a difference in the size displayed in LyX before/after
> > >>> c053a939.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I wouldn't be surprised if this depends on the Qt version (e.g.
> > >>> different Qt "features" and difficulty of Qt getting the high res right)
> > >> 
> > >> No, the problem is the assignment of params_.pixel_ratio to 4.0.
> > >> It seems not needed anymore. I’ve made it to overcome the size problems
> > >> with the internal SVG-converter on HiDPI displays.
> > >> 
> > >> The attached patch fixes it on my system.
> > > 
> > > Fixes it for me as well, and the patch seems simple. Do you recommend it
> > > for 2.2.0?
> > 
> > Yes, I do. Thanks for bisecting.
> 
> Please push.

Note (for archival purposes) that Stephan committed this to master at
21e4e939.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to