On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 18/04/2016 02:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > I imagine Guillaume did not intend this as a full patch, > > Indeed. > > > > > More importantly, the patch does not change anything for me. I am > > testing with lyxinkscape.lyx and lyxinkscape.svg that can be downloaded > > from #9778 (note you need to change the path to lyxinkscape.svg in that > > LyX file). Do you see the problem before your patch is applied and does > > the problem go away after applying your patch? Attached is the > > screenshot for me. > > The difference between the bad display and the good display in this example > svg is the formula in the bottom right, which I can see on your screenshot. > To you see this formula before the patch?
Ah yes I do see what you mean. I did not realize that. Because it was so small I just assumed it was corrupted. > It is strange that it displays so small, here it is at least twice as wide. > But here too I find it too small. I tested and the preview is smaller than > in 2.1.4, so there may be a regression. Interesting. This could be a separate issue. I will do a bisect. > > > > > A final comment---what about svgz? > > The patch is correct in this respect. Good to know. > I attach a new testcase. My comments on the previous email still apply (regarding this new testcase). But now I do see that your patch does make an improvement. And regarding your new testcase, it does not lead to worse display, it is just that my display capabilities of SVG seem to be handicapped, with or without the patch. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
