On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:53:12PM +0000, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 20/03/2016 20:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:33:32AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>>
> >>>The attached patch introduces a new kind of separator, the latexpar
> >>>separator. This is exactly the same as the old parbreak one and the
> >>>only difference is the way parbreak and latexpar kinds are represented
> >>>on screen. The new latexpar is represented exactly as the old parbreak,
> >>>while a parbreak separator is now represented as a double line.
> >>>
> >>>The context menu does not account for latexpar separators and only
> >>>"true" separators can be turned each into the other one.
> >>>
> >>>Note that this is a format change and I don't know whether this is
> >>>allowed at this stage of development.
> >>
> >>Scott? This seems to be a desired change, even if the patch did not
> >>attract any attention, apparently.
> >
> >Thanks for the patch. It is OK that it is a file format change. José or
> >Guillaume do you give a +1?
> >
> 
> I do not have so much time to test and review right now.

OK.

> I do not feel so
> much concerned by the issue, I only tried to give ideas of solutions that
> are simpler and do not require a file format change.

Makes sense.

> Let's hope José has
> more time to test.

José? Can you review and test this patch before Monday? If you do so,
please give an explicit +1 if you support the inclusion of it for 2.2.0.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to