On Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:48:58 PM Enrico Forestieri wrote: > In a nutshell, the old separator layout has gone and now a separator > inset is used in its place. Given that the old separator layout was > introducing a blank line in the latex output, in order to not change > the output, all converted documents use the parbreak separator (denoted > by the unfamiliar character). However, if that blank line is not essential, > you can get the familiar line back by right clicking the unfamiliar > character and changing it to the plain version.
I understand what you say but what is confusing is the representation. I suspect that you know that. :-) When I insert a separator between layouts, be it a Frame or an Theorem, what I want is to have two distinct Frames or two distinct Theorems and not the same Frame or Theorem with another standard paragraph. The separator sign (a line at all length) conveyed that, the new sign does not. That is what is confusing. That the old separator added an extra line is an (unfortunate) implementation detail. That in one form or another I complained since last century (technically my problem was with the way we worked implicitly with the standard paragraph). BTW the plain version representation only covers a small percentage of the line and not most of the line has it happened before where the separation meaning was obvious then. Regards, -- José Abílio
