On Tuesday 13 February 2001 18:01, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > What happened to a clean, consistent interface that is obvious to
non-gurus?
> > We don't use Alt-O for OK.
>
> I don't see why not.
Well, ultimately, it frees up the shortcut to use within the form for those
people that _demand_ that shortcuts be available for anything and everything!
I know... this is a very weak argument. How do you decide on house-style...
> OK, sorry for introducing an inconsistency into your nice source :)
I sound like an old granny! That wasn't really my intention! (Guess that you
guessed that?)
> What to do about FormInclude ? Do I have to replicate a lot of code
> so I can call member functions of InsetInclude ?
Your way ahead of me! Don't understand what you're talking about.
Anyway, now you've pointed out the existence of said files (and continuing to
be an old maid/useful commentator depending on your point of view):
Allan's README in xforms/forms suggests that you use names such as
button_browse
rbutton_include
rbutton_input
rbutton_verbatim
At the time I thought that he was just being a PITA, but over time I've been
converted to the Gospel according to Allan. It makes life easier for others
looking at your source.
I think that Baruch's RadioButtonGroup might make your life a little easier
here too (see FormGraphics).
