On 05/29/2015 07:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Uwe Stöhr <[email protected]> wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 04:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Nevertheless my aim was to split the commits into small
pieces that can easily be reverted if necessary.
I agree that this is indeed a good goal. But I find that you often
have follow-up commits. If you make the commits too small, then if we
need to revert, we might not realize that we need to also revert one
of your follow-up fixes.
And one can still do this if one creates a local branch.
Richard
