On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> wrote: > Am 26.05.2015 um 04:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Nevertheless my aim was to split the commits into small > pieces that can easily be reverted if necessary. I agree that this is indeed a good goal. But I find that you often have follow-up commits. If you make the commits too small, then if we need to revert, we might not realize that we need to also revert one of your follow-up fixes. Scott
