On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: > Op 3-8-2013 9:54, Scott Kostyshak schreef: > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: >>> >>> Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn >>> <v...@lyx.org> >>> >>>>> Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it? >>>> >>>> No, this is not the way to test lyx2lyx. >>>> Vincent >>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry, I meant "This is also a test for lyx2lyx, isn't it?" >> >> My opinion is that we should update those documents. I agree that it >> would be nice to do something to test lyx2lyx in this way, but we >> should do this for more than these files. I haven't thought about the >> best way to do this. In 2.1dev we could include a directory in >> development/autotests/ with all of the docs and examples from the >> 2.0.x branch. This shouldn't increase the size of the git repository >> but it would increase the size of the tar ball. > > > Please don't do this. Things will become a mess, and a nightmare to > maintain.
OK. > Please write proper lyx2lyx tests if you want to test lyx2lyx. OK. Scott
