Yihui, Thank you for your contributions! It's especially impressive how you're continuing to develop LyX support and documentation of Sweave, even though in some sense knitr is a competitor. From what I have been reading, knitr has clear advantages.
Are the following correct? 1. knitr will be integrated in LyX 2.0.3 (through a module) without additional customization. 2. there will be knitr and sweave manuals in the help>specific manuals in LyX 2.0.3. Thanks so very much, Xu On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Yihui Xie <x...@yihui.name> wrote: > That is not right, because the converters are not there if you do not > re-compile LyX. Of course you can add the converters manually; see the > changes in lib/configure.py at > http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7887/knitr.patch (further > instructions on converters: section "For Windows Users" > > http://yihui.name/en/2011/05/sweave-and-pgfsweave-in-lyx-2-0-x-experimental/ > ) > > Regards, > Yihui > -- > Yihui Xie <xieyi...@gmail.com> > Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name > Department of Statistics, Iowa State University > 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Jack Tanner <i...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Yihui Xie <xie <at> yihui.name> writes: > > > >> > >> See http://yihui.github.com/knitr/demo/lyx/ > >> > >> Since you are using Windows, it is recommended to use the first > >> approach (it is difficult and very time-consuming to compile LyX from > >> source under Windows, as the second approach requires). Basically you > >> rename lyxknitr.R to lyxsweave.R and put in under > >> c:/users/me/appdata/roaming/LyX20/scripts; then your Sweave module > >> will actually become a knitr module. > > > > But recompiling LyX shouldn't be necessary to get it to recognize a new > module > > under c:/users/me/appdata/roaming/LyX20/layouts, right? > > >