Am 15.10.2011 19:26, schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
I only want to have a consistent naming - in my opinion this is important
for a documentation.
So, you should have continued using ERT.
Note that it was not me who invented the term "TeX code". The menu Insert->TeX code existed already
when I took over the docs. I therefore used the term consistently until Pavel brought this to the
list. Going back is in my opinion not worth it - would be much work, confusing for users who started
with LyX with version 1.5.3 (don't know exactly) and never and the meaning of ERT is less meaningful
than TeX code for newbies. So let us please end this debate.
I promise not to touch the term outside the docs anymore and let you decide
what you prefer.
What do you mean?
(I used here accidentally the '-' while in the docs I use the term
without it.)
Sigh...
If you call TeX-code this construct:
[[\input{name}]]
given that this one:
[[\input{]]name[[}]]
is TeX code, you should explain where the difference is. But you now
say that you really call ERT "TeX code", making the confusion complete.
In the UserGuide I name the inset/box is TeX code. When I write "insert \blah" as TeX code, I also
give this as example
[[\blah]]
There are many cases in the docs where something like this is described:
[[\href{]]http://www.lyx.org[[}{]]LyX website[[}]]
My description is then:
"insert the command "\href{" as TeX code, then insert the link target, then insert the command "}{"
as TeX code behind it..."
I call the commands like \href "LaTeX commands" or just "commands". I hope it
is now clear what I meant.
ROTFL
What does this mean?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ROTFL&l=1
Whoohoo, I have to google to find out what you meant with this. I thought that it was a finishing
phrase. (Seems that I failed the geek test :-) )
However, I prefer sitting relaxed in my armchair while reading emails. Rolling on the floor makes it
hard to read and my flat is so dirty that I would need to shower afterwards ;-)
best regards
Uwe
