On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:41:18AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 13.10.2011 20:42, schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> If you make now an announcement wit the term "ERT" we can expect
> that most of the users don't know what we mean.
From a random check on the postings in the users list it turns out
that everyone speaks about ERT. TeX-code is to be found only in
your docs and (mis)correcting commits.
> (Note also that
> except of some Wiki pages, this term is nowhere explained since
> years now.)
Because you are diligently trying to kill it (you will not succeed, btw).
> >Whatever the meaning of ERT (I still like the old meaning, btw) the
> >previous entry correctly stated that the commands should be in ERT.
> >It is not the same as TeX-code, because the following (where [[ and ]]
> >delimit ERT)
> >
> >[[\input{]]name[[}]]
> >
> >is TeX-code which is not (fully) in ERT.
>
> This is not TeX-Code. TeX-code is the name of the inset/box. Its
> content can be everything. I think that the docs clearly state this.
So you clearly explain the difference between "TeX-code" and "TeX code"?
ROTFL
--
Enrico
