Le 24/09/2011 18:02, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Julien Rioux
<jri...@physics.utoronto.ca> wrote:
Besides, the terminology ERT has dropped out of favour a long time ago.
What should we use instead then? As far as I'm concerned, ERT is the
only term that accurately describes the inset. 'LaTeX code' or 'TeX
code' are inaccurate, since the inset can contain R code (in Sweave
documents), and a bunch of other things when using 'literate' (I
assume). Moreover, this is the only term that one would encounter on
the ml.
Why do you need ERT for sweave (just curious) ?
JMarc
