Would anyone object to my creating a new resolution in trac that we could use instead of using the keyword fixedinbranch? I'd propose: FixedForBranch, as the resolution.
Why? Well, (i) bugs fixed in branch are fixed and are only awaiting release, so it's more convenient as far as queries go to treat them as closed; (ii) it's impossible to query for bugs fixed in trunk but not in branch, because trac simply won't allow that sort of thing, and that is something I need to be able to, uh, track. If we did this, we might similarly have a FixedForTrunk resolution, to be used for bugs fixed in trunk that are NOT going to be fixed in branch (say, due to a file format change). The fixedintrunk keyword would then be retained ONLY for bugs fixed in trunk that we also intend to fix for branch, but that have not yet been fixed. This is also something I would like to be able to track. Richard
