Richard Heck wrote: > release, so it's more convenient as far as queries go to treat them as > closed;
personally i'm fine with closing them completely. the whole fixedinbranch keywording seems useless to me. if bug is closed with "fixed in 2.0.3" why anybody should not understand whats going on. >(ii) it's impossible to query for bugs fixed in trunk but not in > branch, because trac simply won't allow that sort of thing, and that is > something I need to be able to, uh, track. we did this by setting milestone to the next maintenance release & fixedintrunk keyword, no? pavel
