On 02/05/2011 13:52, Pavel Sanda wrote:
venom00 wrote:
I don't really get this. When used to it, I don't think it is
technically a very difficult workflow. Second, does that mean
that the less skilled developers are only allowed to do small
things and refrain from the larger features because they don't
know how to use the branches ?
I see it as an opportunity to discover something new :)
you are a geek from the very first entrance. my comments was really for
different group of people who may not have time/abilities to discover
what wonderful things can be done with git rebase.
See my other reply. There's basically no difference of work-flow for the
casual contributor.
Even for the more active developers, those with svn commit access, if
for philosophical, religious or laziness reason, they just don't want to
change their work-flow, well, there's a solution for them as well:
commit locally change: git commit -a
push to repo: git push (to some dedicated experimental branch of course)
So for this developer, the only difference would be *one* comment
(commit -a)
What is SOOO complicated here?
Abdel.
